88 A.2d 235 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--83, Trusky v. Ford Motor Company

Citation: 88 A.2d 235, 19 N.J.Super. 100

Opinion Judge: Jayne, J.A.D.

Party Name: MARGARET TRUSKY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, LINCOLN-MERCURY DIVISION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

Attorney: Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys). Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weiner & Weiner, attorneys).

Judge Panel: McGeehan, Jayne and Goldmann.

Case Date: Wednesday April 30, 1952

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

88 A.2d 235 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--83, Trusky v. Ford Motor Company

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 52 A.2d 681 (N.J. 1947), 244, Parker v. John A. Roebling's Sons Co.
New Jersey - 57 A.2d 388 (N.J.L. 1948), | Murphy v. Zink
New Jersey - 58 A.2d 226 (N.J. 1948), 244, Sunkimat v. Senger Coal & Ice Corp.
New Jersey - 6 A.2d 213 (N.J. 1939), 205, Gilbert v. Gilbert MacHine Works, Inc.
New Jersey - 71 A.2d 657 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1950), No. A--77, Galloway v. Ford Motor Co.

See all quotations