87 N.W. 109 (Mich. 1901), Stoner v. Riggs

Citation: 87 N.W. 109, 128 Mich. 129

Opinion Judge: HOOKER, J.

Party Name: STONER v. RIGGS.

Attorney: Where an account is for services for attending to a defendant's business, checks relating to such business, for items which are not covered by defendant's bill of particulars filed with his set-off, are properly excluded. [128 Mich. 130] Clarence Tinker, Osborn & Mills, and Durand & Corton (J. L....

Case Date: Friday July 19, 1901

Court: Michigan Supreme Court