87 Cal.App.4th 738, G027750, Titmas v. Superior Court

Citation: 87 Cal.App.4th 738, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 803

Opinion Judge: [9] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Crosby, J.

Party Name: Titmas v. Superior Court

Attorney: [8] Original proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Hugh Michael Brenner, Judge. Writ granted. Charles E. Ruben for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Duckor Spradling & Metzger, John C. Wynne and Robert J. Solis for Real P...

Case Date: March 06, 2001

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

87 Cal.App.4th 738, G027750, Titmas v. Superior Court

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 329 U.S. 495 (1947), 47, Hickman v. Taylor
California - 10 Cal.3d 351, 30088, Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.
California - 37 Cal.3d 591, 24727, Mitchell v. Superior Court
California - 50 Cal.3d 31, S006168, Southern Cal. Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Com.
California - 19 Cal.4th 1232, S061240, Lewis v. Superior Court

See all quotations