87 A.2d 5 (N.J. 1952), A-75, Danek v. Hommer

Citation: 87 A.2d 5, 9 N.J. 56

Opinion Judge: Oliphant, J.

Party Name: JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS TRADING AS HOMMER TOOL & MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURING CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Attorney: Mr. Meyer M. Semel argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys).

Judge Panel: For affirmance -- Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wachenfeld and Burling. For reversal -- Chief Justice Vanderbilt. Vanderbilt, C.J. (dissenting). VANDERBILT VANDERBILT, C.J. (dissenting).

Case Date: Monday March 10, 1952

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court