87 A. 1119 (N.J.Eq. 1912), Nagle v. Conard
Citation:
87 A. 1119, 80 N.J.Eq. 252
Opinion Judge:
Per Curiam.
Party Name:
DOROTHEA NAGLE, respondent, v. HARRY CONARD et al., appellants
Attorney:
Mr. Thomas Brown, for the respondent. Mr. Adrian Lyon and Mr. Merritt Lane, for the appellants.
Judge Panel:
For affirmance--THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, GARRISON, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MINTURN, KALISCH, BOGERT, VREDENBURGH, VROOM, CONGDON, WHITE, TREACY. For reversal--None. For affirmance--THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, GARRISON, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MINTURN, KALISCH, BOGERT, V...
Case Date:
June 20, 1912
Court:
New Jersey Supreme Court
Linked as:
