869 P.2d 1024 (Wash. 1994), 60252-2, In re Marriage of Greenlaw

Citation: 869 P.2d 1024, 123 Wn.2d 593

Opinion Judge: ANDERSEN, Chief Justice. With advent of the UCCJA the analysis of the continuing jurisdiction problem has changed but the uncertainty and unpredictability of result in the case law has Page 1030 not been reduced Although the problem was recognized by all who dealt with interstate custody, for some unexplained reason it was not explicitly covered by

Party Name: In re the Marriage of Rosemary B. GREENLAW, Respondent, v. Daniel M. SMITH, III, Petitioner.

Attorney: Bertha B. Fitzer, Troup, Christnacht, Ladenburg, McKasy & Durkin, P.S., John J. Durkin, Tacoma, for petitioner. Rosemary B. Greenlaw, pro se., Colleen Allen Grady, Tacoma, amicus curiae for petitioner on Behalf of Northwest Men' Law Center, Inc., Rosemary Daszkiewicz, Seattle, amicus curiae for r...

Judge Panel: UTTER, BRACHTENBACH, DOLLIVER, DURHAM, SMITH, GUY, JOHNSON and MADSEN, JJ., concur.

Case Date: March 17, 1994

Court: Washington Supreme Court