860 A.2d 764 (Conn.App. 2004), 24231, Murphy v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Stamford

Citation: 860 A.2d 764, 86 Conn.App. 147

Opinion Judge: FOTI, J.

Party Name: Karen A. MURPHY et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD et al.

Attorney: Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, the appellants (plaintiffs)., John W. Mullin, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellees (defendants)., FOTI, BISHOP and McLACHLAN, Js. Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, the appellants (plaintiffs). John W. Mul...

Judge Panel: FOTI, BISHOP and McLACHLAN, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: November 23, 2004

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

860 A.2d 764 (Conn.App. 2004), 24231, Murphy v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Stamford

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 716 A.2d 840 (Conn. 1998), 15680, Lauer v. Zoning Com'n of Town of Redding
Connecticut - 788 A.2d 97 (Conn. 2001), Vernon Village, Inc. v. Giulietti
Connecticut - 807 A.2d 480 (Conn.App. 2002), 19807, Fitzpatrick v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.
Connecticut - 811 A.2d 1291 (Conn. 2002), SC 16872, Jones v. Kramer
Connecticut - 827 A.2d 716 (Conn.App. 2003), 23931, Christensen v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Avon

See all quotations