86 S.E.2d 466 (S.C. 1955), 16977, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Harbin

Citation: 86 S.E.2d 466, 226 S.C. 585

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, Plaintiff, v. Charles Ralph HARBIN et al., Defendants.

Attorney: Messrs. T. C. Callison, Attorney General, and James S. Verner, Assistant Attorney General, of Columbia, for Plaintiff, cite: As to proper construction of statute involved here: 172 S.E. 426, 171 S.C. 408; 164 S.E. 588, 166 S.C. 117; 278 F. (2d) 123; 68 S.E.2d 421, 220 S.C. 469; 135 S.E. 153, 137 ...

Case Date: Tuesday March 15, 1955

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

86 S.E.2d 466 (S.C. 1955), 16977, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Harbin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 92 F.2d 547 (D.D.C. 1937), 6890, La Forest v. Board of Com'rs of Dist. of Columbia
Ohio - 7 N.E.2d 220 (Ohio 1937), 25886, Matz v. J.L. Curtis Cartage Co.
South Carolina - 172 S.E. 689 (S.C. 1934), 13766, Henderson v. City of Greenwood
South Carolina - 2 S.E.2d 392 (S.C. 1939), 14854, Schloss Poster Advertising Co. v. City of Rock Hill
South Carolina - 39 S.E.2d 117 (S.C. 1946), 15859, Davis v. Query

See all quotations