86 P.2d 317 (Okla. 1938), 28585, Rose v. Champlin Refining Co.

Citation: 86 P.2d 317, 184 Okla. 203, 1938 OK 622

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: ROSE v. CHAMPLIN REFINING CO. et al.

Attorney: Fred M. Hammer and Major J. Parmenter, both of Oklahoma City, for petitioner. Nathan Scarritt and E. S. Champlin, both of Enid, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

Judge Panel: GIBSON and DAVISON, JJ., absent. DANNER, J., not participating.

Case Date: Tuesday December 06, 1938

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

86 P.2d 317 (Okla. 1938), 28585, Rose v. Champlin Refining Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oklahoma - 1 P.2d 393 (Okla. 1931), 21447, Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Hornberger
Oklahoma - 17 P.2d 370 (Okla. 1932), 23591, Incas Lead & Zinc Co. v. Morgan
Oklahoma - 28 P.2d 7 (Okla. 1933), 24804, Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Evans
Oklahoma - 29 P.2d 86 (Okla. 1934), 24455, Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Patton
Oklahoma - 56 P.2d 847 (Okla. 1936), 26452, Standard Roofing & Material Co. v. Mosley

See all quotations