86 N.E. 641 (Ind. 1908), 21,265, Duncan v. The State

Citation: 86 N.E. 641, 171 Ind. 444

Opinion Judge: Montgomery, J.

Party Name: Duncan v. The State of Indiana

Attorney: Jesse Sanford, Edwin Glascock, Elmer J. Binford and Edward W. Felt, for appellant. James Bingham, Attorney-General, Charles L. Tindall, Prosecuting Attorney, A. G. Cavins, E. M. White and W. H. Thompson, for the State.

Case Date: Thursday December 17, 1908

Court: Indiana Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

86 N.E. 641 (Ind. 1908), 21,265, Duncan v. The State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Indiana - 37 N.E. 343 (Ind. 1894), 16,320, The Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company v. Miller
Indiana - 4 N.E. 852 (Ind. 1886), 12,808, Leverich v. The State
Indiana - 43 N.E. 309 (Ind. 1896), 17,785, Pigg v. The State
Indiana - 46 N.E. 901 (Ind. 1897), 18,062, Anderson v. The State
Indiana - 48 N.E. 352 (Ind. 1897), 18,182, The Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railway Company v. Conoyer

See all quotations