86 A. 1103 (N.J.Eq. 1912), Nagle v. Conard

Citation: 86 A. 1103, 80 N.J.Eq. 253

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam.

Party Name: DOROTHEA NAGLE, respondent, v. HARRY CONARD et al., appellants

Attorney: Mr. Frank J. Higgins, Mr. Thomas Brown and Messrs. Woodbridge & March, for the respondent. Mr. Adrian Lyon, for the appellants.

Judge Panel: For affirmance--THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, GARRISON, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MINTURN, KALISCH, BOGERT, VREDENBURGH, VROOM, CONGDON, WHITE, TREACY. For reversal--None. For affirmance--THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, GARRISON, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MINTURN, KALISCH, BOGERT, V...

Case Date: June 20, 1912

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court