85 S.E.2d 90 (Ga.App. 1954), 35370, Hunter v. State

Citation: 85 S.E.2d 90, 91 Ga.App. 136

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: Azell HUNTER v. The STATE.

Attorney: The evidence here, on the trial of the defendant for operating and maintaining a lottery, although circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused., Azell Hunter was tried an convicted in the Criminal Court of Fulton County on an accusat...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and CARLISLE, J., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday October 20, 1954

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

85 S.E.2d 90 (Ga.App. 1954), 35370, Hunter v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 17 S.E.2d 714 (Ga. 1941), 13920, Wrisper v. State
Georgia - 32 S.E.2d 912 (Ga.App. 1945), 30724, Ball v. State
Georgia - 61 S.E.2d 570 (Ga.App. 1950), 33264, Goss v. State
Georgia - 72 S.E.2d 771 (Ga.App. 1952), 34276, Green v. State