85 N.E.2d 393 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1949), Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Tel. Co. v. City of Cincinnati

Citation: 85 N.E.2d 393, 84 Ohio App. 521

Opinion Judge: ROSS, J.

Party Name: CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TEL. CO. v. CITY OF CINCINNATI.

Attorney: MATTHEWS, P. J., dissenting., Action by the Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Company, a corporation, against the City of Cincinnati, a municipal corporation, for damages to its conduits occurring during repair of a city water line. From the judgment, defendant appeals on questions of law.--, ...

Judge Panel: MATTHEWS, P. J., dissenting. ROSS and HILDEBRANT, JJ., concur in syllabus, opinion and judgment. MATTHEWS, Presiding Judge, (dissenting).

Case Date: Monday January 10, 1949

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

85 N.E.2d 393 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1949), Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Tel. Co. v. City of Cincinnati

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 22 N.E.2d 540 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1938), J. & F. Harig Co. v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio - 61 N.E.2d 201 (Ohio 1945), 30193, Wilkeson v. Erskine & Son
Ohio - 74 N.E.2d 239 (Ohio 1947), 30976, Interstate Sash & Door Co. v. City of Cleveland
Ohio - 82 N.E.2d 565 (Ohio App. 2 Dist. 1948), Eiber Realty Co. v. Dunifon