85 A.2d 527 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-511, Healy v. Billias

Citation: 85 A.2d 527, 17 N.J.Super. 119

Opinion Judge: McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

Party Name: HEALY et al. v. BILLIAS et al.

Attorney: Nathan A. Reuben, Newark, argued the cause for appellants. Philip M. Lustbader, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Schneider & Schneider, Newark, attorneys).

Judge Panel: Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, Jr.

Case Date: Thursday December 20, 1951

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

85 A.2d 527 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-511, Healy v. Billias

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 119 A. 86 (N.J.L. 1922), Hannon v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company
New Jersey - 74 A.2d 297 (N.J. 1950), No. A--148, Pirozzi v. Acme Holding Company of Paterson
New Jersey - 78 A.2d 406 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-681, Pepe v. Urban
New Jersey - 85 A.2d 523 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-455, Smith v. Smith
New Jersey - 86 A.2d 238 (N.J. 1951), A-43, In re Koretzky's Estate