843 A.2d 685 (Conn.App. 2004), 23757, Puchalski v. Mathura

Citation: 843 A.2d 685, 82 Conn.App. 272

Opinion Judge: DIPENTIMA, J.

Party Name: Miroslaw PUCHALSKI v. Magnus A. MATHURA et al.

Attorney: Juri E. Taalman, Scotland, with whom, on the brief, was Timothy Brignole, Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Jack G. Steigelfest, with whom, on the brief, was Constance L. Epstein, Hartford, for the appellees (defendants)., FOTI, FLYNN and DIPENTIMA, Js. Juri E. Taalman, Scotland, with wh...

Judge Panel: FOTI, FLYNN and DIPENTIMA, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: March 30, 2004

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

843 A.2d 685 (Conn.App. 2004), 23757, Puchalski v. Mathura

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 458 A.2d 362 (Conn. 1983), DeMilo v. City of West Haven
Connecticut - 509 A.2d 512 (Conn. 1986), Taylor v. American Thread Co.
Connecticut - 688 A.2d 1341 (Conn.App. 1997), 15013, Annecharico v. Patterson
Connecticut - 736 A.2d 889 (Conn. 1999), 15808, George v. Ericson
Connecticut - 760 A.2d 117 (Conn.App. 2000), 19529, Daigle v. Metropolitan Property and Cas. Ins. Co.

See all quotations