84 A.2d 18 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-414, Brandt v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Mount Holly Tp.

Citation: 84 A.2d 18, 16 N.J.Super. 113

Opinion Judge: JACOBS, S.J.A.D.

Party Name: BRANDT v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF MOUNT HOLLY TP. et al.

Attorney: Robert W. Criscuolo, Mount Holly, argued the cause for appellants (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, Mount Holly, attorneys). James M. Davis, Jr., Mount Holly, argued the cause for respondent.

Judge Panel: Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

Case Date: Wednesday October 24, 1951

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

84 A.2d 18 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-414, Brandt v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Mount Holly Tp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 42 A.2d 753 (N.J. 1945), 213, National Lumber Products Co. v. Ponzio
New Jersey - 54 A.2d 451 (N.J. 1947), 210, Sitgreaves v. Board of Adjustment of Town of Nutley
New Jersey - 54 A.2d 723 (N.J. 1947), 259, Lynch v. Borough of Hillsdale
New Jersey - 59 A.2d 622 (N.J.L. 1948), | Lynch v. Borough of Hillsdale
New Jersey - 73 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1950), No. A--124, Lumund v. Board of Adjustment of The Borough of Rutherford