84 A.2d 11 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-489, Paparazzo v. Perkel

Citation: 84 A.2d 11, 16 N.J.Super. 128

Opinion Judge: EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

Party Name: PAPARAZZO v. PERKEL.

Attorney: Jacob E. Max, Jersey City, argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent. (Abraham J. Slurzberg, Jersey City, of counsel). Elmer J. Bennett, Jersey City, argued the cause for the defendant-appellant. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, Jersey City, attorneys; Patrick A. Dwyer and James P. Beggans, Jersey...

Judge Panel: Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

Case Date: October 24, 1951

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

84 A.2d 11 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-489, Paparazzo v. Perkel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 50 A.2d 635 (N.J.L. 1947), 46, Salvato v. New Jersey Asphalt and Paving Company
New Jersey - 80 A.2d 570 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-95, Bardack v. Extract
New Jersey - 80 A.2d 636 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-88, Slovak Catholic Sokol v. Foti
New Jersey - 80 A.2d 647 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-97, Dandrea v. Centofante
New Jersey - 83 A.2d 441 (N.J. 1951), A-1, State v. Alexander

See all quotations