830 A.2d 388 (Conn.App. 2003), 23369, Ankerman v. Mancuso

Citation: 830 A.2d 388, 79 Conn.App. 480

Opinion Judge: DIPENTIMA, J.

Party Name: William L. ANKERMAN, v. Jack C. MANCUSO.

Attorney: William L. Ankerman, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff)., James Colin Mulholland, Glastonbury, for the appellee (defendant)., LAVERY, C.J., and DiPENTIMA and McLACHLAN, Js. William L. Ankerman, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). James Colin Mulholland, for the appellee (defendant).

Judge Panel: LAVERY, C.J., and DiPENTIMA and McLACHLAN, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: September 16, 2003

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

830 A.2d 388 (Conn.App. 2003), 23369, Ankerman v. Mancuso

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 529 A.2d 171 (Conn. 1987), 13118, Mozzochi v. Beck
Connecticut - 579 A.2d 594 (Conn.App. 1990), 8705, Noble v. Marshall
Connecticut - 583 A.2d 646 (Conn.App. 1990), 8889, Dorsey v. Mancuso
Connecticut - 585 A.2d 1234 (Conn. 1991), Dorsey v. Mancuso
Connecticut - 627 A.2d 901 (Conn. 1993), 14507, Statewide Grievance Committee v. Botwick

See all quotations