83 A.2d 710 (N.J. 1951), A-4, Capone v. Norton

Citation: 83 A.2d 710, 8 N.J. 54

Opinion Judge: ACKERSON, J.

Party Name: CAPONE v. NORTON. PANEPINTO v. NORTON. RIDGEWOOD CLEANERS, Inc. v. NORTON.

Attorney: Charles S. Barrett, Jr., Newark, argued the cause for the appellant (Lum, Fairlie & Foster, Newark, attorneys). Louis Santorf, Paterson, argued the cause for the respondents Mary Capone and Peter Panepinto (John A. Masiello, Paterson, attorney for Mary Capone; Benjamin P. Galanti, Lodi, attorney ...

Judge Panel: Case and Oliphant, JJ., dissented. For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices BURLING and ACKERSON-3. For reversal: Justices CASE and OLIPHANT-2.

Case Date: Monday October 15, 1951

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

83 A.2d 710 (N.J. 1951), A-4, Capone v. Norton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 44 A. 964 (N.J. 1899), Graham v. The Consolidated Traction Company
New Jersey - 24 A.2d 371 (N.J.L. 1942), 30, Nelson v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., A Corp.
New Jersey - 3 A.2d 601 (N.J.L. 1939), 13, Marendino v. Spitz
New Jersey - 71 A.2d 121 (N.J. 1950), No. A--58, Batts v. Joseph Newman, Inc.
New Jersey - 78 A.2d 126 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A 438, Capone v. Norton

See all quotations