83 A.2d 344 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-408, Heyman v. Bishop

Citation: 83 A.2d 344, 15 N.J.Super. 266

Opinion Judge: COLIE, J.S.C.

Party Name: HEYMAN v. BISHOP.

Attorney: Howard K. Stokes, Newark (Wise & Wise, Red Bank, attorneys), argued the cause for appellant. David Goldstein, Asbury Park (Goldstein & Novogrod, Asbury Park, attorneys), argued the cause for respondent.

Judge Panel: Before Judges COLIE, GRIMSHAW and HARTSHORNE.

Case Date: September 11, 1951

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

83 A.2d 344 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-408, Heyman v. Bishop

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 189 A. 54 (N.J.L. 1937), Trust Company of New Jersey, A Corporation v. Doherty
New Jersey - 59 A.2d 407 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1948), 158/78, Wolk v. Widlansky
New Jersey - 64 A.2d 230 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1949), No. A--40--48, The First National Bank and Trust Company of Montclair v. Zink
New Jersey - 73 A.2d 536 (N.J. 1950), No. A--129, Sheild v. Welch