82 S.E.2d 891 (Ga.App. 1954), 35219, Barrington v. State

Citation: 82 S.E.2d 891, 90 Ga.App. 326

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: BARRINGTON v. STATE.

Attorney: (a) The victim in a seduction case is not an accomplice within the meaning of the rule of law that the testimony of an accomplice is not sufficient, without corroboration, to authorize a conviction., (b) The evidence in this case sufficiently showed the essential elements of the offense of seduct...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and CARLISLE, J., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday July 07, 1954

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

82 S.E.2d 891 (Ga.App. 1954), 35219, Barrington v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 11 S.E. 856 (Ga. 1890), O'Neill v. State
Georgia - 121 S.E. 136 (Ga.App. 1924), 15121, Davis v. State
Georgia - 187 S.E. 621 (Ga.App. 1936), 25708, Collins v. State
Georgia - 31 S.E. 92 (Ga. 1898), Keller v. State
Georgia - 52 S.E. 910 (Ga. 1905), Washington v. State

See all quotations