82 S.E.2d 735 (Ga.App. 1954), 35183, Shockley v. State

Citation: 82 S.E.2d 735, 90 Ga.App. 237

Party Name: SHOCKLEY v. STATE.

Attorney: The court erred in denying the motion for a new trial, for the reasons set forth in the body of the opinion., Clifford Shockley will be referred to as the defendant. He was convicted of involuntary manslaughter on an indictment charging, omitting the formal parts, that he did 'Unlawfully * * * wi...

Case Date: Monday May 31, 1954

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

82 S.E.2d 735 (Ga.App. 1954), 35183, Shockley v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 7 Ga. 2 (Ga. 1849), 2, Studstill v. State
Georgia - 150 S.E. 579 (Ga. 1929), 7259, Eich v. State
Georgia - 164 S.E. 485 (Ga.App. 1932), 22259, De Vere v. State
Georgia - 41 S.E. 609 (Ga. 1902), Overby v. State
Georgia - 41 S.E. 609 (Ga. 1902), Collins v. Moore

See all quotations