82 Cal.App.4th 473, E024244, Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion v. City of Rancho Cucamonga

Citation: 82 Cal.App.4th 473, 98 Cal.Rptr.2d 202

Party Name: Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion v. City of Rancho Cucamonga

Attorney: [7] Law Office of Craig A. Sherman and Craig A. Sherman; Loeb & Loeb and Malissa Hathaway McKeith for Plaintiff and Appellant. James L. Markman, City Attorney; Richards, Watson & Gershon and Steven H. Kaufmann for Defendant and Respondent. Hewitt & McGuire, Mark R. McGuire and Andrew K. Hartzell ...

Case Date: July 20, 2000

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

82 Cal.App.4th 473, E024244, Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion v. City of Rancho Cucamonga

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 67 Cal.2d 536, 28495, Eye Dog Foundation v. State Bd. of Guide Dogs for Blind
California - 6 Cal.4th 1112, S027252, Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California
California - 7 Cal.4th 1193, S030738, Lundquist v. Reusser
California - 217 Cal.App.3d 200, G004798, Viejo Bancorp, Inc. v. Wood
California - 226 Cal.App.3d 1467, A046292, Benton v. Board of Supervisors

See all quotations