818 A.2d 789 (Conn.App. 2003), 22129, Chadha v. Shimelman

Citation: 818 A.2d 789, 75 Conn.App. 819

Opinion Judge: LAVERY, C.J.

Party Name: Mohinder P. CHADHA v. Myer B. SHIMELMAN et al.

Attorney: Mohinder P. Chadha, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff)., Thomas J. Ring, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Richard J. Lynch, assistant attorney general, for the appellees (defendants)., LAVERY, C.J., and FOTI and LANDAU, Js. Mohind...

Judge Panel: LAVERY, C.J., and FOTI and LANDAU, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: April 01, 2003

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

818 A.2d 789 (Conn.App. 2003), 22129, Chadha v. Shimelman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 519 U.S. 868 (1996), 96-144, Narumanchi v. Abdelsayed
Connecticut - 81 A. 1013 (Conn. 1911), Hassett v. Carroll
Connecticut - 169 A.2d 260 (Conn. 1961), State v. Whiteside
Connecticut - 493 A.2d 236 (Conn. 1985), Bleich v. Ortiz
Connecticut - 510 A.2d 1337 (Conn. 1986), Petyan v. Ellis

See all quotations