813 A.2d 1030 (Conn.App. 2003), 22489, Pinney, Payne, Van Lenten, Burrell, Wolfe and Dillman, P.C. v. Tamsett

Citation: 813 A.2d 1030, 74 Conn.App. 617

Opinion Judge: SCHALLER, J.

Party Name: PINNEY, PAYNE, VAN LENTEN, BURRELL, WOLFE AND DILLMAN, P.C., et al. v. Susan O. TAMSETT.

Attorney: Susan O. Tamsett, pro se, the appellant (defendant)., Christopher G. Winans, Danbury, for the appellee (named plaintiff)., LAVERY, C.J., and SCHALLER and DRANGINIS, Js. Susan O. Tamsett, pro se, the appellant (defendant). Christopher G. Winans, for the appellee (named plaintiff).

Judge Panel: LAVERY, C.J., and SCHALLER and DRANGINIS, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: January 28, 2003

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

813 A.2d 1030 (Conn.App. 2003), 22489, Pinney, Payne, Van Lenten, Burrell, Wolfe and Dillman, P.C. v. Tamsett

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 52 A. 403 (Conn. 1902), Barton v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 370 A.2d 996 (Conn. 1976), City of Hartford v. Local 308, Intern. Broth. of Police Officers, N. A. G. E.
Connecticut - 441 A.2d 65 (Conn. 1981), Mazur v. Blum
Connecticut - 574 A.2d 194 (Conn. 1990), Daley v. City of Hartford
Connecticut - 761 A.2d 705 (Conn. 2000), 16152, Ramos v. Town of Vernon

See all quotations