81 Cal.App.4th 529, C031783, Ball v. GTE Mobilnet of California

Citation: 81 Cal.App.4th 529, 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 801

Party Name: Ball v. GTE Mobilnet of California

Attorney: [8] Law Office of Franklin & Franklin, J. David Franklin, Law Office of Anthony A. Ferrigno, Anthony A. Ferrigno, Law Office of Whitmer & Law, James Whitmer for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Law Office of Farella, Braun & Martel, Douglas R. Young, Robert C. Holtzapple, Grace K. Won, Law Office of Al...

Case Date: June 08, 2000

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

81 Cal.App.4th 529, C031783, Ball v. GTE Mobilnet of California

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 78 F.3d 842 (2nd Cir. 1996), 1001, Connecticut Dept. of Public Utility Control v. F.C.C.
Federal Cases - 831 F.2d 627 (6th Cir. 1987), 85-1684, In re Long Distance Telecommunications Litigation
Federal Cases - 205 F.3d 983 (7th Cir. 2000), 99-2127, Bastian v. AT&T Wireless Services
Federal Cases - 111 F.3d 469 (6th Cir. 1997), 95-4358, GTE Mobilnet of Ohio v. Johnson
Federal Cases - 881 F.Supp. 285 (W.D.Ky. 1995), Civ. A. C94-0171, Commonwealth of Ky. ex rel. Gorman v. Comcast Cable of Paducah, Inc.

See all quotations