807 A.2d 955 (Conn. 2002), 16761, United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East Windsor

Citation: 807 A.2d 955, 262 Conn. 11

Opinion Judge: NORCOTT, J.

Party Name: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. TOWN OF EAST WINDSOR.

Attorney: Gregory F. Servodidio, with whom were Julie A. Morgan and, on the brief, Elliott B. Pollack, Bridgeport, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Frank W. Murphy, Norwalk, with whom was Kara T. Murphy, Branford, for the appellee (defendant)., BORDEN, NORCOTT, KATZ, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js. Gregory F...

Judge Panel: BORDEN, NORCOTT, KATZ, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js.

Case Date: Tuesday November 05, 2002

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

807 A.2d 955 (Conn. 2002), 16761, United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East Windsor

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 92-102, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Federal Cases - 523 U.S. 1058 (1998), 97-723, Hunter v. Connecticut
Federal Cases - 534 U.S. 1019 (2001), 01-409, Gangale v. Penson Financial Services, Inc.
Connecticut - 154 A.2d 608 (Conn. 1959), Burritt Mut. Sav. Bank of New Britain v. City of New Britain
Connecticut - 270 A.2d 549 (Conn. 1970), Connecticut Printers, Inc. v. Redevelopment Agency of City of Hartford

See all quotations