803 A.2d 343 (Conn.App. 2002), 21701, Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck

Citation: 803 A.2d 343, 71 Conn.App. 600

Opinion Judge: BISHOP, J.

Party Name: Michael DAUBERT v. BOROUGH OF NAUGATUCK et al.

Attorney: D. Kirt Westfall, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Richard T. Stabnick, Glastonbury, for the appellees (defendants)., LAVERY, C.J., and BISHOP and PETERS, Js. D. Kirt Westfall, for the appellant (plaintiff). Richard T. Stabnick, for the appellees (defendants).

Judge Panel: LAVERY, C.J., and BISHOP and PETERS, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: Tuesday August 20, 2002

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

803 A.2d 343 (Conn.App. 2002), 21701, Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 115 A. 691 (Conn. 1921), Grabowski v. Miskell
Connecticut - 710 A.2d 825 (Conn.App. 1998), 16891, Masko v. Board of Educ. of Town of Wallingford
Connecticut - 727 A.2d 1253 (Conn. 1999), 15907, Kish v. Nursing and Home Care, Inc.
Connecticut - 746 A.2d 743 (Conn. 2000), 16081, Kolomiets v. Syncor Intern. Corp.
Connecticut - 748 A.2d 278 (Conn. 2000), 16102, Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.

See all quotations