80 A.2d 235 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-86-50, Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.

Citation: 80 A.2d 235, 13 N.J.Super. 56

Opinion Judge: McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

Party Name: NEYLON v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Attorney: Verling C. Enteman, Newark, argued the cause for respondent-appellant (McCarter, English & Studer, Newark, attorneys). Sam Weiss, Perth Amboy, argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Lewis S. Jacobson, Perth Amboy, attorney).

Judge Panel: Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, Jr.

Case Date: Thursday April 12, 1951

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

80 A.2d 235 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1951), A-86-50, Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Louisiana - 42 So.2d 304 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1949), 3149, Patin v. T. L. James & Co.
New Jersey - 12 A.2d 130 (N.J.L. 1940), | Ciocca v. The National Sugar Refining Company of New Jersey
New Jersey - 24 A.2d 392 (N.J.L. 1942), 20, Molnar v. American Smelting and Refining Company
New Jersey - 31 A.2d 759 (N.J. 1943), | Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.
New Jersey - 35 A.2d 896 (N.J.L. 1944), | Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.

See all quotations