8 S.E.2d 905 (S.C. 1940), 15082, McCoy v. Town of York

Citation: 8 S.E.2d 905, 193 S.C. 390

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the Court was delivered by MR. JUSTICE BAKER.

Party Name: McCOY v. TOWN OF YORK et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Dunlap & Dunlap, for appellant, cite: Constitutionality of ordinance passed after permit granted: 49 A. L. R., 772; 118 U.S. 366. As to unreasonableness of ordinance: 72 S. C., 1; 51 S. E., 443; 76 S. C., 128; 56 S. E., 651; 83 S. C., 372; 65 S. E., 387; 125 S. C., 530; 119 S. E., 241; 30...

Case Date: May 09, 1940

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

8 S.E.2d 905 (S.C. 1940), 15082, McCoy v. Town of York

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 77 U.S. 497 (1871), Yates v. City Of Milwaukee
South Carolina - 119 S.E. 241 (S.C. 1923), 11302, City of Columbia v. Alexander
South Carolina - 172 S.E. 689 (S.C. 1934), 13766, Henderson v. City of Greenwood
South Carolina - 196 S.E. 1 (S.C. 1938), 14646, Fincher v. City of Union
South Carolina - 2 S.E.2d 36 (S.C. 1939), 14839, Gasque, Inc. v. Nates