8 Cal.App.3d 112, 34770, Vittal v. Long Beach Unified Sch. Dist.

Citation: 8 Cal.App.3d 112, 87 Cal.Rptr. 319

Opinion Judge: [10] Herndon

Party Name: Vittal v. Long Beach Unified Sch. Dist.

Attorney: [7] Baird, Mooney & Baird and Woodrow W. Baird for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] John D. Maharg, County Counsel, and Louis S. Gordon, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant.

Case Date: Tuesday May 26, 1970

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

8 Cal.App.3d 112, 34770, Vittal v. Long Beach Unified Sch. Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 17 Cal.2d 753, 16548, Fry v. Board of Education
California - 18 Cal.2d 478, 16004, Martin v. California Mutual B. & L. Assn.
California - 18 Cal.2d 586, 17898, Kacsur v. Board of Trustees
California - 53 Cal.2d 218, 20276, Heckley v. Board of Ed. of Oakland Unified School Dist., Alameda County
California - 125 Cal.App.2d 44, 4687, Baldwin v. Fresno City Etc. School Dist.

See all quotations