8 A.2d 530 (Conn. 1939), Carlin v. Haas

Citation: 8 A.2d 530, 126 Conn. 8

Opinion Judge: BROWN, Judge.

Party Name: CARLIN v. HAAS.

Attorney: Roger W. Davis, Douglas Wright, and William S. Locke, all of Hartford, for appellant. Harry M. Albert and Michael V. Blansfield, both of Waterbury, for appellee.

Judge Panel: HINMAN and JENNINGS, JJ., dissenting. Argued Before MALTBIE, C.J., and HINMAN, AVERY, BROWN, and JENNINGS, JJ. In this opinion MALTBIE, C.J., and AVERY, J., concurred. HINMAN, Judge (dissenting). In this opinion JENNINGS, J., concurred.

Case Date: Monday June 26, 1939

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

8 A.2d 530 (Conn. 1939), Carlin v. Haas

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 112 A. 350 (Conn. 1921), Neuman v. Apter
Connecticut - 132 A. 451 (Conn. 1926), Richard v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co.
Connecticut - 137 A. 725 (Conn. 1927), Jackson v. Brown
Connecticut - 147 A. 822 (Conn. 1929), Estabrook v. Main
Connecticut - 160 A. 892 (Conn. 1932), Correnti v. Catino

See all quotations