798 A.2d 1002 (Conn.App. 2002), 21342, Matzul v. Town of Montville

Citation: 798 A.2d 1002, 70 Conn.App. 442

Opinion Judge: FREEDMAN, J.

Party Name: Frederick A. MATZUL et al. v. TOWN OF MONTVILLE et al.

Attorney: Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, for the appellants (plaintiffs)., Ronald F. Ochsner, Norwich, for the appellees (defendants)., LAVERY, C.J., and LANDAU and FREEDMAN, Js. Lloyd L. Langhammer, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Ronald F. Ochsner, for the appellees (defendants).

Judge Panel: LAVERY, C.J., and LANDAU and FREEDMAN, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: June 18, 2002

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

798 A.2d 1002 (Conn.App. 2002), 21342, Matzul v. Town of Montville

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 541 A.2d 478 (Conn. 1988), 13209, 84 Century Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Tax Review of Town of Rocky Hill
Connecticut - 68 A.2d 161 (Conn. 1949), Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Borough of Naugatuck
Connecticut - 692 A.2d 742 (Conn. 1997), 15462, United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 731 A.2d 733 (Conn. 1999), 15980, DeSena v. City of Waterbury