793 A.2d 278 (Conn.App. 2002), 20815, State v. Constantopolous

Citation: 793 A.2d 278, 68 Conn.App. 879

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: STATE of Connecticut v. Michael CONSTANTOPOLOUS.

Attorney: Michael Constantopolous, pro se, the appellant (defendant)., Gerard P. Eisenman, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Jonathan Benedict, state's attorney, for the appellee (state)., SCHALLER, BISHOP and STOUGHTON, Js. Michael Constantopolous, pro se, the appellant (def...

Judge Panel: SCHALLER, BISHOP and STOUGHTON, Js.

Case Date: Tuesday April 02, 2002

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

793 A.2d 278 (Conn.App. 2002), 20815, State v. Constantopolous

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 546 A.2d 292 (Conn.App. 1988), 4558, State v. McNellis
Connecticut - 567 A.2d 823 (Conn. 1989), 13508, State v. Golding
Connecticut - 673 A.2d 530 (Conn.App. 1996), 12765, State v. Wall
Connecticut - 779 A.2d 80 (Conn. 2001), 16393, Cobham v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut - 781 A.2d 285 (Conn. 2001), 15922, State v. Cator

See all quotations