79 Cal.App.3d 57, 17585, Richard v. Scott

Citation: 79 Cal.App.3d 57, 144 Cal.Rptr. 672

Opinion Judge: [10] Tamura

Party Name: Richard v. Scott

Attorney: [7] MacLachlan, Burford & Stanfield and Gerald M. Stanfield for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Olen G. Miller and Mark L. Gunn for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday March 24, 1978

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

79 Cal.App.3d 57, 17585, Richard v. Scott

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 25 Cal.2d 165, 19013, Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp.
California - 28 Cal.2d 357, 19598, Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California - 31 Cal.2d 689, 17554, Owings v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California - 32 Cal.2d 791, 20585, Brewer v. Second Baptist Church
California - 39 Cal.2d 327, 22178, Clifford v. Ruocco

See all quotations