789 A.2d 1024 (Conn.App. 2002), 20950, In re Latifa K.

Citation: 789 A.2d 1024, 67 Conn.App. 742

Opinion Judge: SCHALLER, J.

Party Name: In re LATIFA K. et al. [*]

Attorney: William R. Kinloch, Waterbury, for the appellant (respondent-father)., Mary K. Lenehan, assistant attorney general, Cheshire, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, Hartford, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner)., FOTI, SCHA...

Judge Panel: FOTI, SCHALLER and EDWARD Y. O'CONNELL, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: January 29, 2002

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

789 A.2d 1024 (Conn.App. 2002), 20950, In re Latifa K.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 622 A.2d 1047 (Conn.App. 1993), 10511, In re Romance M.
Connecticut - 641 A.2d 378 (Conn. 1994), 14804, In re Romance M.
Connecticut - 714 A.2d 1265 (Conn.App. 1998), 16886, In re Angellica W.
Connecticut - 720 A.2d 1112 (Conn.App. 1998), 17590, In re Roshawn R.
Connecticut - 729 A.2d 245 (Conn.App. 1999), 17392, State v. Rolli

See all quotations