787 A.2d 559 (Conn.App. 2001), 21027, Wittman v. Krafick

Citation: 787 A.2d 559, 67 Conn.App. 415

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Brian WITTMAN v. Ellen KRAFICK.

Attorney: Ellen Krafick, pro se, the appellant (defendant), filed a brief, Judith Ellenthal, Stamford, filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff). Counsel Ellen Krafick, pro se, the appellant (defendant), filed a brief. Judith Ellenthal filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).

Judge Panel: LAVERY, C.J., and SCHALLER and DALY, Js.

Case Date: Tuesday December 25, 2001

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

787 A.2d 559 (Conn.App. 2001), 21027, Wittman v. Krafick

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 561 A.2d 443 (Conn.App. 1989), 6467, Weinstein v. Weinstein
Connecticut - 773 A.2d 952 (Conn.App. 2001), 19734, Mullen and Mahon, Inc. v. Mobilmed Support Services, LLC
Connecticut - 781 A.2d 356 (Conn.App. 2001), 20269, Strobel v. Strobel
Connecticut - 786 A.2d 426 (Conn. 2001), New Haven Savings Bank v. LaPlace
Connecticut - 787 A.2d 608 (Conn.App. 2001), 21673, In re Alexander C.