780 P.2d 407 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1989), 2 CA-JV 88-0036, Matter of Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397

Citation: 780 P.2d 407, 161 Ariz. 574

Opinion Judge: [11] Per Curiam

Party Name: In the Matter of the Appeal in PIMA COUNTY SEVERANCE ACTION NO. S-2397.

Attorney: [7] Peter W. Hochuli, Tucson, for natural mother. [8] Edith A. Croxen, Tucson, for minors. [9] Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Laurie S. Beaver, Tucson, for the State.

Case Date: June 21, 1989

Court: Arizona Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

780 P.2d 407 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1989), 2 CA-JV 88-0036, Matter of Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 455 U.S. 745 (1982), 80-5889, Santosky v. Kramer
Arizona - 543 P.2d 809 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1975), 2 CA-CIV 1955, Matter of Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. S-111
Arizona - 660 P.2d 479 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1982), 1 CA-JUV 175, Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. A-26961
Arizona - 667 P.2d 1345 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1983), 1 CA-JUV 196, Matter of Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374
Arizona - 667 P.2d 228 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1983), 1 CA-JUV 189, Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25525

See all quotations