78 Cal.App.3d 654, 39501, Cane v. City and County of San Francisco

Citation: 78 Cal.App.3d 654, 144 Cal.Rptr. 316

Opinion Judge: [10] Christian

Party Name: Cane v. City and County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Jerome N. Field and Reed H. Bement for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, George E. Baglin, Deputy City Attorney, Robert M. Adams, Jr., Duane W. Dresser, Cotton, Seligman & Ray, Guilfoyle & Dole and Richard F. Dole for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: March 15, 1978

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

78 Cal.App.3d 654, 39501, Cane v. City and County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 85 F. 359 (5th Cir. 1898), 576, Bartholomew v. City of Austin
Federal Cases - 314 U.S. 14 (1941), 603, Curry v. United States
Arizona - 227 P.2d 1011 (Ariz. 1951), 5462, City of Phoenix v. Landrum & Mills Realty Co
California - 65 Cal. 456, 9,598, Cottle v. Spitzer
California - 45 Cal.2d 546, 23564, De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San Diego

See all quotations