78 Cal.App.3d 61, 40900, Long v. City and County of San Francisco

Citation: 78 Cal.App.3d 61, 144 Cal.Rptr. 64

Opinion Judge: [10] Scott

Party Name: Long v. City and County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Thomas M. O'Connor and George Agnost, City Attorneys, William A. Barrett and Marie Burke Lia, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Furth, Fahrner & Wong, Frederick P. Furth, Stitt & Dombroski, Clyde W. Stitt, Gilbert T. Graham and Mark N. Aaronson for Plaintiffs and Respo...

Case Date: February 27, 1978

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

78 Cal.App.3d 61, 40900, Long v. City and County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 421 F.Supp. 1314 (D.Me. 1976), Civ. 74-134, Dupler v. City of Portland
Federal Cases - 429 U.S. 288 (1977), 75-1261, Knebel v. Hein
California - 4 Cal.3d 669, 22788, Mooney v. Pickett
California - 10 Cal.App.3d 77, 27235, Rosas v. Montgomery
California - 57 Cal.App.3d 44, 38249, City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court

See all quotations