78 A.2d 83 (N.J. 1951), A-36, Carlson v. Hannah

Citation: 78 A.2d 83, 6 N.J. 202

Opinion Judge: ACKERSON, J.

Party Name: CARLSON v. HANNAH et al.

Attorney: Archibald Kreiger, Paterson, argued the cause for the appellant (Samuel L. Biber, Paterson, attorney). Abraham J. Slurzberg, Jersey City, argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent Gilbert W. Carlson (Harold K. Smith, Jersey City, attorney). Paladeau & Foley, Jersey City, presented a brief on ...

Judge Panel: For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON-7. For reversal: None.

Case Date: Monday January 08, 1951

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

78 A.2d 83 (N.J. 1951), A-36, Carlson v. Hannah

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 100 A. 211 (N.J.L. 1917), 25, Frank v. Board of Education of Jersey City
New Jersey - 176 A. 137 (N.J.L. 1935), 101, Baurhenn v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
New Jersey - 186 A. 457 (N.J. 1936), 435, Levine v. Blumenthal
New Jersey - 70 A.2d 736 (N.J. 1950), No. A--40, Jenkins v. Devine Foods, Incorporated, a Corp.
New Jersey - 72 A.2d 183 (N.J. 1950), No. A--85, Mead v. Wiley Methodist Episcopal Church

See all quotations