772 P.2d 1336 (Or. 1989), SC S35015, Lindgren v. Berg

Citation: 772 P.2d 1336, 307 Or. 659

Opinion Judge: VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Party Name: Paul E. LINDGREN and Eric W. Lindgren, Petitioners on Review, v. Arthur H. BERG, Respondent on Review, Ron L. Sundholm, Doris Meyer, and U.S. Escrow Corporation, a corporation, Defendants.

Attorney: Susan R. Swanson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With her on the petition was Hampson, Bayless, Murphy & Stiner, Portland. Rex Armstrong, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response was Bogle & Gates, Portland.

Case Date: May 02, 1989

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

772 P.2d 1336 (Or. 1989), SC S35015, Lindgren v. Berg

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - 11 P.2d 281 (Or. 1932), Glickman v. Weston
Oregon Caselaw - 12 P.2d 1005 (Or. 1932), Glickman v. Weston
Oregon Caselaw - 566 P.2d 505 (Or. 1977), Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot
Oregon Caselaw - 688 P.2d 811 (Or. 1984), SC 29951, Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc.
Oregon Caselaw - 749 P.2d 1212 (Or.App. 1988), CA A36918, Lindgren v. Berg

See all quotations