77 S.E.2d 311 (S.C. 1953), 16774, Arthur v. Byrnes

Citation: 77 S.E.2d 311, 224 S.C. 51

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: ARTHUR v. BYRNES, Governor, et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Robinson, Robinson & Dreher, of Columbia, for Petitioner, cite: As to State Institution Bond Act being unconstitutional because the Special Fund is not reasonably sufficient to retire the bonds: 152 S.C. 455, 150 S.E. 269; 219 S.C. 485, 66 S.E.2d 33; 135 S.C. 288, 135 S.E. 153; 35 Wash. (...

Case Date: August 18, 1953

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

77 S.E.2d 311 (S.C. 1953), 16774, Arthur v. Byrnes

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Colorado - 31 P.2d 325 (Colo. 1933), 13433, In re Senate Resolution No. 2 Concerning Constitutionality of House Bill No. 6
Georgia - 185 S.E. 323 (Ga. 1936), 11228, Campbell v. Burton
South Carolina - 150 S.E. 269 (S.C. 1929), 12746, State v. Moorer
South Carolina - 151 S.E. 469 (S.C. 1930), 12822, Watson v. Livingston
South Carolina - 181 S.E. 476 (S.C. 1935), 14136, Crawford v. Johnston

See all quotations