762 P.2d 10 (Wash.App. Div. 2 1988), 10508-0, Kimball v. Millet

Citation: 762 P.2d 10, 52 Wn.App. 512

Opinion Judge: WORSWICK,

Party Name: Clayton KIMBALL and Kate Kimball, husband and wife, Respondents, v. Earl Lamar MILLET and Vina Mae Millet, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Appellants.

Attorney: Harold B. Field, Wayne Murray, Murray, Dunham & Murray, Seattle, for appellants., George L. Wood, Jr., Platt, Irwin, Colley, Oliver, Miller & Wood, Port Angeles, for respondents.

Judge Panel: REED, C.J., and PETRICH, J. Pro Tem., concur.

Case Date: September 29, 1988

Court: Washington Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

762 P.2d 10 (Wash.App. Div. 2 1988), 10508-0, Kimball v. Millet

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New York - 4 N.Y.2d 592, Rauch v. Jones
New York - 59 N.Y.2d 1017, Heritage v. Van Patten
Washington - 458 P.2d 12 (Wash. 1969), 39997, Regan v. City of Seattle
Washington - 557 P.2d 9 (Wash.App. Div. 1 1976), 4088, Amburgy v. Golden
Washington - 595 P.2d 541 (Wash. 1979), 45663, Thompson v. Lewis County

See all quotations