76 So. 52 (Ala. 1917), 6 Div. 428, Hamaker v. Whitfield

Citation: 76 So. 52, 200 Ala. 286

Opinion Judge: MAYFIELD, J. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: HAMAKER v. WHITFIELD.

Attorney: W.L. Longshore, of Columbiana, and Smith & Morrow, of Birmingham, for appellant. James M. Russell and D. Goode Tinsley, both of Birmingham, for appellee.

Judge Panel: ANDERSON, C.J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur. ANDERSON, C.J., and McCLELLAN, SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur. MAYFIELD, J., dissents, adhering to the views expressed in the original opinion of the court heretofore affirming the cause.

Case Date: Thursday May 31, 1917

Court: Alabama Supreme Court