76 S.E. 1096 (S.C. 1913), Berger v. Charleston Consol. Ry., Gas & Electric Co.

Citation: 76 S.E. 1096, 93 S.C. 372

Opinion Judge: WOODS, J.

Party Name: BERGER v. CHARLESTON CONSOL. RY., GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

Attorney: W. A. Holman and Logan & Grace, all of Charleston, for appellant. Mordecai & Gadsden and Rutledge & Hagood, all of Charleston, for respondent.

Case Date: January 13, 1913

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

76 S.E. 1096 (S.C. 1913), Berger v. Charleston Consol. Ry., Gas & Electric Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 12 S.E. 413 (S.C. 1890), Price v. Richmond & D. R. Co.
South Carolina - 16 S.E. 289 (S.C. 1892), Reed v. Northeastern R. Co.
South Carolina - 38 S.E. 634 (S.C. 1901), In re Mayo's Estate
South Carolina - 44 S.E. 375 (S.C. 1903), Watson v. Southern Ry.
South Carolina - 76 S.E. 978 (S.C. 1913), Knight v. Jones