759 P.2d 253 (Or. 1988), SC S33273, Heino v. Harper

Citation: 759 P.2d 253, 306 Or. 347

Opinion Judge: GILLETTE, J.

Party Name: Dorothy M. HEINO, Petitioner on Review, v. Roy L. HARPER, Defendant, Arno Heino, Respondent on Review.

Attorney: Charles S. Tauman, Portland, argued the cause on behalf of petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Bennett, Hartman, Tauman & Reynolds, Portland. Duane Vergeer, Portland, argued the cause on behalf of respondent on review. The responses were filed by Thomas Sauberli and Vergeer, Roehr ...

Case Date: August 02, 1988

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

759 P.2d 253 (Or. 1988), SC S33273, Heino v. Harper

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites