75 S.E. 657 (Ga. 1912), Rome Industrial Ins. Co. v. Eidson

Citation: 75 S.E. 657, 138 Ga. 592

Opinion Judge: LUMPKIN, J. (after stating the facts as above).

Party Name: ROME INDUSTRIAL INS. CO. v. EIDSON.

Attorney: Anderson, Felder, Rountree & Wilson, of Atlanta, and Dean & Dean, of Rome, Ga., for plaintiff in error. Napier, Wright & Cox, and Stevens & Ogburn, all of Atlanta for defendant in error.

Case Date: Monday August 19, 1912

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

75 S.E. 657 (Ga. 1912), Rome Industrial Ins. Co. v. Eidson

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 52 Ga. 640 (Ga. 1874), The Georgia Masonic Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Gibson
Georgia - 50 S.E. 1000 (Ga. 1905), Hutson v. Prudential Ins. Co.
Georgia - 51 S.E. 339 (Ga. 1905), Johnson v. Aetna Ins. Co.
Georgia - 54 S.E. 643 (Ga. 1906), Bank of Commerce v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Georgia - 54 S.E. 66 (Ga. 1906), Vardeman v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.

See all quotations