75 S.E.2d 752 (S.C. 1953), 16740, Hodge v. Pollock

Citation: 75 S.E.2d 752, 223 S.C. 342

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: HODGE v. POLLOCK et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Lyles & Lyles, of Spartanburg, for Appellant, cite: As to no unnecessary hardship being shown as result of enforcement of zoning laws: 168 A. L. R. 113; 129 Conn. 280; 168 A. L. R. 26; 168 A. L. R. 27; 72 S.E.2d 66, 222 S.C. 165. As to burden of proving unnecessary hardship being on party...

Case Date: May 04, 1953

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

75 S.E.2d 752 (S.C. 1953), 16740, Hodge v. Pollock

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 37 S.E.2d 128 (N.C. 1946), 92, Lee v. Board of Adjustment of City of Rocky Mount
New Hampshire - 63 A.2d 221 (N.H. 1949), 3760, Roland St. Onge v. Concord
New York - 298 N.Y. 365, Hickox v. Griffin
South Carolina - 72 S.E.2d 66 (S.C. 1952), 16659, Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Bd. of Adjustment
Connecticut - 151 A. 183 (Conn. 1930), Lathrop v. Town of Norwich

See all quotations