75 A.2d 57 (Conn. 1950), Katz v. Katz

Citation: 75 A.2d 57, 137 Conn. 134

Opinion Judge: BALDWIN, Judge

Party Name: KATZ v. KATZ et al.

Attorney: Edward S. Pomeranz, Hartford, William P. Aspell, Hartford, for appellants. Morris Apter, Hartford, Julius Apter and Milton Nahum, Hartford, for appellee.

Judge Panel: Jennings and Murphy, JJ., dissented. Before BROWN, C.J., O'SULLIVAN, JENNINGS, and BALDWIN, JJ., and MURPHY, J., Superior Court. In this opinion BROWN, C.J., and O'SULLIVAN, J., concurred. In this opinion MURPHY, J., concurred.

Case Date: Tuesday July 18, 1950

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

75 A.2d 57 (Conn. 1950), Katz v. Katz

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 101 A. 492 (Conn. 1917), Swanson v. Latham & Crane
Connecticut - 105 A. 346 (Conn. 1918), Scalia v. American Sumatra Tobacco Co.
Connecticut - 111 A. 594 (Conn. 1920), Procaccino v. E. Horton & Sons
Connecticut - 128 A. 782 (Conn. 1925), Lake v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut - 130 A. 674 (Conn. 1925), Corvi v. Stiles & Reynolds Brick Co.

See all quotations